Seldom Asked Copyright Questions
- What is it about music recordings that might
be copyright protected? and how would I know?
- How is selling or distributing programs on videotape
different than television?
- Could anyone copy old recordings for resale,
much like making "antique" reproductions?
What is it
about music recordings that might be copyright protected? and
how would I know? There are
6 primary areas of protection concerning published phonorecords:
- The words or poetry that is sung in a vocal version. The
words are a separate entity for protection purposes, so non-public
domain words can be added to an otherwise PD music composition.
This is especially common with respect to a modern English translation
of foreign works, the most famous of which is "How Great
Thou Art". Other examples include the Morman Tabernacle
Choir singing their own copyrighted English words to the Columbia
version of "Finlandia" and the Disney words substituted
in "Fantasia" for Ave Maria. Once recorded, these vocals
are difficult or impossible to fully remove from the underlying
instrumental bed. To receive copyright protection however the
lyrics [prior to 1988] would have to be based on a printed version
that is registered at the copyright office, so conceivably there
is hope that a search of registrations would find that.
- The written liner notes and cover artwork, as with any publication
intended for distribution, can be copyrighted. Use caution in
scanning album covers. As with other printed materials prior
to 1988, a circle "C" symbol or word "copyright",
year of registration and name of owner must be clearly visable
to claim protection. This claim of copyright refers only to the
printed matter, and not to the recording.
- The music that is played by the instruments, more commonly
referred to as the "composition". The absense of a
circle "C" symbol or other claims on the record label
does not mean there is no copyright. The law allows this one
exemption on the presumption that proper claims would appear
on the printed version of the sheet music required for registration,
and that the song name and author as printed on the label would
be adequate credit for researching rights. When BMI began its
challenge to ASCAP to represent performance rights, it was quickly
discovered that tracking down ownerships in the pre-computer
era proved impossible. So sometime in the 70s, the printed record
labels began to indicate whether ASCAP or BMI rights were applicable.
If either organization is listed, then it is a safe bet that
the composition used is copyrighted. Today, both groups have
on-line internet database of coverage which helps in researching
those older records that do not list rights information. Song
titles themselves are not copyrighted, a number of very different
songs could have the same title, so research is done using the
composer's name as the key.
- The recording(s) themselves. Since 1909, any sound recordings
(phonorecords) sold or otherwise distributed to the public were
declared to be publications for copyright purposes. Stamping
records was viewed as the equivalent to printing magazines. Except
that they were denied copyright status, probably as a reaction
to Tom Edison's abuse of composer's royalties with his talking
machine patents. Starting in February 1972, record companies
could make a copyright claim on phonorecords, using the circle
"P" symbol (although not required after 1988). To keep
radio and television stations from facing a new kind of royalty
payment (to the record producer), they were specifically exempted
with respect to broadcast use. For others to use any music from
a CD, you have to also get permission from the recording company,
even if the music composition is public domain.
- Concerning CDs (including factory pre-recorded mini disk
(MD) and digital compact cassette (DCC)), they are further covered
by Copyright Act Chapter 10, Digital Audio Recording Devices
and Media. Should you decide to make a direct digital copy, either
cloned or re-sampled, you may be required to purchase media that
has a pre-paid royalty included in its price. Like you would
have a choice. All the CD recorders used here refuse to operate
without the royalty-paid media, even though all our sources are
public domain. Likewise, our computer used to replicate those
CDs see's the "copyright status" of these home recorded
items and places protection symbols on our public domain copies.
Can't be too safe,eh??
- While not copyrights, trademarks of the original manufacture
never expire. They are there to properly identify the product
and must be used with that intention. TM or circle R symbol help
identify the trade name to be protected. back
to top
How is selling or distributing
programs on videotape different than television? television
is a lot easier. Broadcast television and radio have a number
of important exemptions in the copyright laws, including free
use of phonorecords (CDs). Videotape and cable distribution requires
permission of the recording company which is difficult or impossible
to obtain. The only 'free' use for videographers is when covering
an actual event, no additional permissions are needed to incorporate
any music that might be performed. This is a "news"
exclusion which obviously applies only when a video portrays the
actual event (such as a public concert or parade). Reuse of this
material for other uses (such as a background element for a different
program) would not be covered. Copyright coverage kicks in upon
the act of distribution. Thus it is not necessary to actually
sell a video to be infringing. Free copies given away as promos,
copies that a not sold but used for training sessions, copies
shown at conventions or corporate board meeting are all example
of "distribution". back to top
Could anyone copy old recordings
for resale, much like making "antique" reproductions?
Only when using pre-1972 phonorecords that do not have copyright
on the music composition. The original session tapes and copies
therefrom are not phonorecords in the legal terminology, thus
they carry copyright protection as un-published items. Also, making
resale items decorated to appear as antique for purposes of fraud
is not legal. And the trademarks of the original vendors must
be properly respected, at no time should the public be confused
as to who manufactured the product they are purchasing. back
to top